Tout dans la vie est une question d'équilibre d'où la nécessité de garder un esprit sain dans un corps sain.

Discipline-Volonté-Persévérance

Everything in life is a matter of balance therefore one needs to keep a healthy mind in a healthy body.

Discipline-Will-Perseverance.

E. do REGO

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Entraînement par intervalles


EnvoyerImprimerPDF

Les séances d’entraînement par intervalles sont les plus efficaces et les plus amusantes

Afin de conserver sa motivation et d’améliorer sa condition physique, rien de tel que l’entraînement par intervalles; il s’agit de la forme d’entraînement dont les effets sont les plus probants sur la condition physique et sur la performance tout en évitant la monotonie. Par exemple, un bon programme d’entraînement pourrait comprendre, chaque semaine, deux ou trois séances intermittentes et une ou deux séances de type continu (un peu moins pour les personnes qui pratiquent également d’autres activités comme le ski de randonnée, la course à pied, la musculation, etc.).

Notez que, pour chaque séance, il faut prévoir une période d’échauffement (moulinage à intensité faible et progressivement augmentée) d’environ 5 à 10 minutes, de même qu’une période de retour au calme d’au moins 2 minutes. Quand on atteint des phases où l’effort est plus prononcé, l’idée est de retrouver une intensité relative plus élevée que celle qu’on adopte spontanément dans une séance de type continu, mais qu’on pourra reproduire sans s’épuiser autant que prescrit, moyennant des périodes de repos actif. Rappelez-vous que, pour donner des résultats concluants, une séance d’entraînement intermittente ne doit pas obligatoirement mener à l’épuisement!

Le type de séance suggéré consiste à alterner des périodes d’effort plus intense avec des périodes de moulinage à faible intensité en suivant le modèle illustré dans le tableau qui présente 22 exemples de séances de ce type.

Ainsi, par exemple, la séance numéro 1, qui vise le développement et l’entretien de l’endurance, l’un des déterminants de la performance en cyclisme, demande d’effectuer 3 séries de 7 répétitions (total de 21 répétitions) d’un effort d’une durée de 2 minutes. Ces fractions d’effort doivent être entrecoupées de périodes de récupération active (il s’agit de mouliner sans effort) de 2 minutes. Entre les séries de 7 répétitions, on observe une période de récupération active plus longue de 5 minutes.

On peut choisir d’effectuer l’une de ces séances à plusieurs reprises, ce qui permet d’apprendre rapidement à bien doser son effort. Aussi, on peut choisir de varier le stress d’entraînement en les exécutant dans un ordre ou dans un autre.

Au début, il nous apparaît difficile de bien doser notre effort en nous entraînant par intervalles, étant donné que nous sommes habitués à nous entraîner à partir de notre fréquence cardiaque. Avec l’entraînement par intervalles, il est important de pouvoir garder le même niveau d’intensité lors de l’effort. Si vous avez de la difficulté à terminer votre dernière série, il est possible que votre niveau d’effort soit trop élevé; la prochaine fois, diminuez votre effort. Par contre, si à la dernière série vous vous dites que vous auriez pu en donner un peu plus, alors vous devrez augmenter votre effort.

Bon entraînement par intervalles!

Extrait d’un article de Guy Thibault, "Suer en hiver", Vélo Mag, 1998, p.25-27

Entraînement par intervalles
Wikio

Le volume avant l'intensité


EnvoyerImprimerPDF

Nous voilà déjà à l’aube d’une nouvelle saison de vélo. Pour la majorité d’entre vous, vous avez conservé la forme en pratiquant une activité physique durant l’hiver. Si c'est le cas, vous êtes déjà avancés dans votre préparation pour passer au vélo. Il vous faudra quand même prévoir une reprise prudente avec un travail en souplesse à très faible intensité. Ce sont les bases de votre entraînement que vous allez devoir construire.

En changeant d’activité physique, les muscles sollicités changent aussi. Si vous sortez d’une saison de ski en grande forme, essayez de faire votre première sortie de vélo à la même intensité que vous faisiez votre ski; vous découvrirez que certains muscles ont hiberné. Il faut réhabituer PROGRESSIVEMENT les muscles à l’effort, les muscles qui sont au repos depuis quelques mois doivent dicter la vitesse de cette progression.

C'est d’abord sur le volume qu'il va falloir travailler, en prenant soin de conserver des allures relativement faibles, pour ne pas brûler les étapes. Selon Mike Walden, entraîneur de plusieurs grands cyclistes américains, cette étape est essentielle. L’entraînement à faible intensité améliore l’élasticité des capillaires et permet d’augmenter l’alimentation des muscles en oxygène. De plus, cette étape doit se faire avant le travail en intensité.

Vous devez pouvoir discuter avec vos partenaires d'entraînement durant toute la sortie, sans vous retrouver essoufflé. C'est un bon critère pour vérifier si vous travaillez à la bonne intensité. Votre fréquence cardiaque devrait se maintenir entre 60 % et 70 % de votre fréquence maximale. Pour être vraiment profitable, vous devez rouler au moins 1 000 km de cette façon (les pros en font quelques milliers). Il peut être intéressant de commencer cette étape à l’intérieur. Dans ce cas, il est préférable d’utiliser un système (trainer ou roller) qui permet d’utiliser votre vélo.

Durant cette période, vous devez pédaler tout en souplesse. Les gros braquets sont à proscrire, vous choisissez un braquet qui vous permet de maintenir une cadence d’au moins 80 rpm. Au fil des entraînements, vous essayez d’augmenter votre cadence sans toutefois que le haut du corps se mette à " sauter ". Vous pouvez espacer quelques sprints d’une dizaine de secondes à haute révolution. Un bon exercice pour améliorer votre cadence : pédaler en utilisant une seule jambe sur de courtes distances.

Le volume de travail devra être croissant au fil des semaines pour assurer une bonne progression (ne pas augmenter les distances de plus de 10 % par semaine). Il conviendra de débuter par des circuits relativement plats pour assurer un travail à intensité réduite, puis choisir des parcours vallonnés afin de travailler progressivement en force. De même, les braquets devront rester modestes en première partie du cycle, puis vous pourrez passer par intermittence sur le grand plateau dans les portions faciles.

Ces consignes ne doivent en rien modifier l'intensité de travail convenue au départ (entre 60 % et 70 % de votre fréquence cardiaque maximale), et vous devrez durant l'ensemble de ces séances maintenir un niveau d'effort vous permettant de tenir une conversation sans vous essouffler outre mesure.

Est-il nécessaire de se rappeler que chaque séance d’entraînement se commence et se termine de la même façon : 15 à 20 minutes à faible allure et en souplesse. Les muscles sont plus efficaces si on les réchauffe avant de les solliciter vigoureusement. En roulant à faible allure en fin d’entraînement, vous éliminez l’acide lactique accumulé dans vos muscles. N’oubliez pas que les étirements, qui se font après l’entraînement, vous assureront une meilleure récupération et amélioreront vos qualités musculaires.

En début de saison, place au volume, et seulement au volume. Plutôt que de voir du caoutchouc et de l’asphalte, admirez les paysages que vous n'avez peut-être jamais pris le temps d'observer. Profitez de cette période pour raffiner votre technique, car quand vous roulez dans le "piton" c’est difficile de penser technique. C’est le temps idéal pour pratiquer les différentes techniques et règles pour rouler en groupe.

Lorsque vous aurez suivi ces quelques conseils et que vous aurez atteint au moins 1 000 km, vous pourrez solliciter par intermittence votre organisme par des intensités plus soutenues : accélérations en haut des bosses, rythme plus soutenu sur de courtes distances, ou encore quelques sorties courtes en accélérant l'allure (sans pour autant vous mettre dans le rouge) sur des intervalles de 5 à 10 minutes, suivis du même temps en récupération en reprenant l'allure foncière (60 % à 70 % de votre fréquence cardiaque maximale).

Julien ASSELIN, Club Cycliste Sport-en-Tête, 2001

Wikio

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Three Work-Arounds for Physique Success




3 Solutions for Complex Situations

Recently I've faced three challenging scenarios:

Scenario 1 — A client wanted bigger, stronger legs. Problem was, he had horrible knees that prevented him from squatting or lunging.

Scenario 2 — An athlete injured his hand and couldn't hold weights, but he needed to keep training hard.

Scenario 3 — A Figure competitor who was already eating clean and doing metabolic workouts wasn't seeing any further fat loss. And her show was looming.

Believe it or not, we were able to work around these issues and keep their results coming! Here's how.


Scenario #1: Big Legs, Bad Knees

This is a common problem that plagues many lifters, and a lot of coaches and trainers just turn these clients away. But what kind of coach would I be if I couldn't develop creative ways for motivated athletes to successfully make gains while dealing with limitations?

As JC Santana says, "A good coach should be able to effectively train someone in an elevator if he had to." Put simply, as coaches we need to be creative, especially for folks who can't do the usual stuff because they possess a pair of wrecked knees.

One of my favorite knee-friendly strength training exercises is the half-squat, half-deadlift. (See video.)

If you have bad knees, usually any movement that requires a lot of knee bend, such as a squat or lunge, will be painful. You'll notice that this exercise doesn't force the knee to bend all that much. Instead, it emphasizes more involvement from the posterior chain (glutes and hamstrings) muscles.

Another fantastic, knee-friendly lower body exercise is the anterior reaching lunge. Let me warn you, this exercise will make your glutes very sore the first time you try it! Just remember to go as heavy as you can without rounding your back.

Need a few more knee-sparing exercises? Check out my article, Joint-Friendly Training.

Workout Program for Bad Knees

Here's a sample lower-body training program for those TMUSCLE readers with jacked-up knees:

1. Romanian Deadlifts:

2A. Single-Leg Hip Bridge (Bent Leg):

2B. Reverse Sled Drag (low stance):

3. Calves:

4. Forward Sled Drag (for conditioning):

1. Single-Leg Half-Squat Half-Deadlift:

2A. Single-Leg Hip Bridge (Straight Leg):

2B. Reverse Sled Drag (tall stance):

3. Calves:

4. Sled Push (for conditioning):

1. Go as heavy as possible on sled exercises.

2. Anterior reaching lunge can be a substitute for RDLs or bench hip bridges.

3. Stay in a pain-free range of motion on all exercises.

4. All calf exercises are okay and can be used for training variety.

5. If you have bad knees, take your Flameout™!


Scenario #2: No Hands, Strong Muscles

To the serious lifters who are wondering how you're going to lift heavy while dealing with that nasty finger, hand, wrist, or elbow injury that prevents you from holding anything, I've got one piece of equipment you must get ASAP — ab straps. Yep, the straps you hang from to do leg raises.

Check out these exercises using ab straps that I've used to help my injured athletes lift big weights while working around injuries and limitations:

Tall Standing Rows and Bent-Over Vertical Rows with Ab Straps

As you can see by the pics to the right, the ab straps eliminate the need to hold anything in your hand. Plus, even you if you have an elbow injury, you can usually still perform this and all the other movements below because the ab strap is placed abovethe elbow joint, eliminating any stress.

And in regard to the Bent-Over rows, yes, I know that your body is standing vertical, but the resistance load is coming from above your head, which is comparable to a lat pulldown. So, technically it's a vertical pull.

Now, I realize the range of motion of these pulling exercises is slightly less than using a handle. But keep in mind that this guy was unable to hold anything. So, I think using a slightly reduced range of motion is still better than doing no pulling at all!

On a side note, these pulling variations are also great for wrestlers and MMA fighters!

Slide Board Pec Fly/Push-Up

Creating effective upper-body pushing exercises to work around an injury that limits you from holding anything or putting pressure on your wrists is tricky. Here's one way to make it work.

Check out the video to the right. It's no joke, even if you're not injured! If you don't have a slide board, no problem. Just find a tile or waxed wood floor and place socks under your arms in the same manner as shown in the video.

Rotary Cable Pull with Ab Straps

This exercise has its roots in my MMA and grappling conditioning programs. That said, with a little modification it's a great way to train the all important "core" and perform some rotary training if you can't hold a cable handle.

Reverse Sled Pull with Ab Straps

Abs straps can even be used in conjunction with sled and tire dragging. Check out the reverse sled pull to the right. Or work on your tan outside with a tire!

Hip Dominant Sled Drag with Harness

You're going to need a heavy-duty shoulder harness for this one!

Wrestler's Sled/Tire Drag with Ab Straps

Full props to JC Santana for showing me this one. This exercise is one of my personal favorites. It's great because it integrates both upper-body pushing muscles along with the driving of the legs to move the sled or tire. If you're a fighter or wrestler, give this one a shot. It'll turn you into a friggin' beast!


Scenario #3: The Stalled-Out Figure Competitor

This last scenario is actually about my girlfriend, Alli McKee. Alli's issue can be summed up with one word: adaption.

Long before Alli ever met me, right up until she began training for her Figure show, all she ever did was perform metabolic workouts that would bury even the most elite CrossFitter. Alli's body had became so adapted to this type of training that it learned to be more energy conservative. Therefore, the workouts were no longer effective at burning fat.

As they say, everything works, but nothing works forever. So I had to find a way to offset this adaption process so that we could later use metabolic training to re-spark fat loss. In other words, for a short time I had to transform her from a gas efficient Toyota Prius to a gas guzzling Ford F350.

So, I thought about who were the most energy inefficient athletes on the planet — bodybuilders and powerlifters. Bodybuilding had much more carryover to the sport of Figure, so I started training her like a bodybuilder. We followed a four-day, upper body/lower body split.

We stayed within the general bodybuilding/hypertrophy range of 3-5 sets of 6-12 reps. I paired up exercises to increase rest time between sets. We kept the intensity of each exercise high and we did almost zero conditioning except for some sprints to maintain some level of quickness and athleticism.

After six weeks of teaching her body not to conserve energy, but to "give it all" every time, she not only dropped body fat but gained five pounds of muscle! We then began to re-integrate the metabolic training protocols back into her program.

It was amazing to watch her actually get gassed during the metabolic exercises she once finished with a smile on her face. Although it hurt her ego, we both knew it meant that her body was no longer adapted to this training and it would help to actually burn fat this time around.

It worked like a charm because as you can see in the pictures from her show, Alli got lean and looked amazing, leaving me both a proud trainer and a damn lucky guy!


Wrap-Up

I'm well aware that some folks reading this may disagree with my approach to solving these problems. But whether you agree or not, these approaches worked! Listen, I'd don't care about always being right; I just care about always being helpful.

I hope these real-world solutions to common problems help you as much as they helped my clients!





3 Work-Arounds for Physique Success

Bent-Over Row


3 Work-Arounds for Physique Success

Rotary Cable Pull

3 Work-Arounds for Physique Success

Hip Dominant Sled Drag with harness

3 Work-Arounds for Physique Success

Wrestler's Drag


About Nick Tumminello

The Owner of Performance U, Nick Tumminello is a nationally recognized coach and educator who trains a select group of athletes, physique competitors, and exercise enthusiasts in Baltimore, MD. Nick is a regular presenter for organizations like IDEA, ECA, AFPA and is a CEC provider for ACE. He's the developer of the Core Bar and has produced numerous best-selling DVDs, including Strength Training for Fat Loss & Conditioning. Nick's new DVD, CNS Activation can be purchased here. To get your free "Smarter and Stronger in 7" video course, check out his new blog.


© 1998 — 2009 Testosterone, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Wikio

Monday, December 7, 2009

Complexes 2.0 — Optimize Your Fat-Loss Workouts



It's impossible not to notice trends in the fitness world. The majority of these—like the ridiculous Ab Lounge—last for a year or so and then are either forgotten or shoved underneath the bed next to the dust balls and discarded dirty underwear.

But some trends are actually beneficial and become staples in the training programs of thousands of lifters.

Take weight-training circuits (also called "complexes") for fat-loss. When programmed properly, they have the potential to strip off fat faster than any other protocol, but when half-assed or shoddily constructed they become a giant waste of time.

This article will teach you how to set up your own advanced complexes to burn the most fat without looking like a pansy.


Wait. What's a Complex?

It's pretty straightforward: cycle through a series of exercises without putting the bar down, transitioning smoothly from movement to movement, and performing all the assigned reps on one exercise before moving to the next.

I thought all us "coaches" had a fairly good handle on it, but I was wrong.

My first indication was when I read a workout in a newsstand magazine. This complex, written by a guy who had enough letters behind his name to know better, took a completely ass-backwards approach. I wrote it off as a fluke.

Less than a week after that, I was in the gym and saw a student athlete muscle his way through what I can only assume was his version of a home-brew complex. And by that, I mean he would do a bunch of reps on one exercise, and then a bunch on another, with no real thought to the order.

Despite the great examples that can be found, like this article , I still see people absolutely ruining themselves in the gym.

Here's the issue.


Efficacy vs. Expediency

The trend right now is fast-paced, interval-type weight training workouts designed for fat-loss. This is a good thing, and truth be told, these type of workouts make up a good part of my clients' programming for fat-loss.


Overall, the idea is to do as much work as possible in the shortest period of time, focusing on training speed and density.

However, when people randomly throw exercises together to create a complex, they're often not really paying attention to anything other than the idea of complexes. They're too focused on doing more work in less time to lose fat and haven't even considered if the exercises they picked were effective.

Let's say you have a guy doing the following complex:

He's doing a lot of big movements, but is he really getting much out of some of them? Hopefully the deadlift is his strongest movement, but he can't really use a weight that's challenging since he's limited by the overhead press, which is undoubtedly weaker.

In terms of "doing a lot of stuff" in not a lot of time, this guy is on point. He's veryexpedient. But he's missing out on a lot since the complex isn't very effective. Or at least not as effective as it could be.

But if this guy used a different set up, he could work with a weight that's challenging for all parts of the complex and would get significantly better results.


Complexes 2.0

Here's where a lot of coaches and I part ways. Many trainers who prescribe complexes are OK with the notion that your weakest exercise limits your strongest one. I consider it a limitation of basic complex design that can be completely eliminated with a bit of forethought and some ingenuity.

Going back to the example above, the weight is incredibly light for our guy to deadlift, but perfect for the overhead press. Popular training literature suggests that we shouldn't care about that, since the complex is not intended to challenge you in the same way that traditional weight training is. That is, an overly-light deadlift is of no concern, because we are deadlifting just to lose fat.

I'm calling bullshit.

Instead, what if we did twice as many deadlifts as overhead presses or only used exercises where the weight was appropriate for the same number of reps on each?

What I'm about to show you aren't regular complexes. They're advanced. Or as I like to call them, Complexes 2.0.

But first, let's look at some of the problems with current complexes.

1) Too much focus on uniformity of reps.

I have no idea where it came from, but there seems to be some unwritten rule that when you perform a complex, you need to do the same number of reps for each exercise. Sure, it's one way to do it, but it's only effective if that same weight is equally challenging on all of the selected exercises.

2) Improper exercise selection

It's more effective to have the weight be equally challenging on all exercises. So if you're not going with a variable rep method like I mentioned above, it's better to select exercises that require an equal level of intensity to perform.

3) Improper exercise order

I can't stress enough the importance of properly ordering exercises for maximizing the effectiveness of your complexes. Throwing presses, cleans, squats and deads together in any haphazard order is just stupid.


Roman's Rules for Designing Complexes

Rule 1: When arranging exercises, "high skill" exercises come first.

Exercises should be performed in a descending order from the most demanding to the least demanding. I mean, why the hell would you put a hang clean in the middle of your complex? Also, by "demanding" I don't just mean the hardest exercises. I mean those requiring the highest level of technical proficiency.

High skill exercises include the Full Clean, Full Snatch, High Pull From the Floor, and Overhead Squat.

Moderate skill exercises include the Hang Clean, Hang Snatch, High Pull From the Hang, Power Clean, Power Snatch, Push Press, Deadlift, and Front Squat.

Low skill exercises include the Bent-over Row, Overhead Press, Lunge Variations, Back Squat, and Dumbbell Squat.

Rule 2: Use a non-competing exercise order.

Non-competing exercises are those that don't rely on the same muscles. The benefit of this protocol is simple: while one group is working, the others are resting. Given that complexes work with series of muscle groups at once, don't get too hung up on specifics here. Generally, try to alternate a pushing exercise with a pulling exercise, or an upper body movement with a lower body one.

Rule 3: Never select a weight heavier than your 10RM on your weakest exercise

I believe that complexes should be short. The entire draw of complexes is that they're brutal but brief. By imposing a 10RM weight limit based on our weakest exercise in a given complex, we ensure that the complex will generally stay in the area of 6-8 reps, which I believe is the most effective range.


Methods of Complex Execution

Given everything I've told you about the right and wrong way to set up complexes, it seems reasonable that there are some contradictory ideas, especially if you're used to the "old method" of just doing random exercises in a random order for a pre-set number of reps.

Instead, here are two advanced methods for extreme masochists looking for extreme fat-loss.

Select exercises you can do for roughly the same number of reps with a given weight. Assume you want to do complexes with roughly 5-6 reps. Choose a series of exercises that you can do for roughly 12 reps (not necessarily your 12RM) with the same weight, and set up your complex according to the rules.

Select the exercises you want to perform in the complex as based on the above rules. Then, test your absolute max number of reps on each exercise. For the complex, do 50 to 60 percent of your max number of reps for each exercise. In this way, you might get a complex that requires you to do six overhead presses followed by 12 front squats followed by eight bent-over rows.

Both of these methods are highly effective. Here are a few examples to get you started.


Sample Complex 1 — The Rep-Based Method

Here's a complex I've been using for both my athletes and myself. (I'll use myself as an example.)

I selected exercises I'm about equally strong on, could do for 12-15 reps, and chose a weight of 175 pounds. For me, those exercises were:

It's only five exercises, but I'm using the same fairly heavy weight for each. Now, I'm not the strongest guy in the world, but for me, this was absolutely brutal.

Note the order of exercises: I started with the one that required the most technical skill. From there, I alternated non-competing muscles. Generally I go upper/lower, but in the case of moving from the bent-over row to the push press, it's obviously just moving from a pulling exercise to a pressing one.

In terms of number of reps, I normally aim for about six to start.

However, we've done all sorts of fun variations at my gym including:

5 sets with 90 seconds rest between.
(6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1) with 75 seconds rest in between
( 4, 3, 2, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4). Rest periods are 45s, 30s, 20s, 5s, 5s, 20s, 30s

Keep in mind there are dozens of ways to set up your rep protocol.


Sample Complex 2 — The Weight-Method

This is a complex designed for one of my female soccer players. Lauren is attractive, strong, and never complains—the kind of client that makes me love my job.

For her complex, we set the weight at 55 pounds and pre-tested her maxes for the following exercises:

Here's how we set it up:

ExercisePre-Tested MaxPrescribed Complex
Full Snatch22 reps12 reps
Alternating Reverse Lunge15 reps per leg8 reps per leg
Push Press14 reps7 reps
Bent-over Row9 reps5 reps
Back Squat17 reps9 reps

In this example, Lauren is obviously weakest in the bent-over row. If we were to follow normal complex protocol, we'd just do the same number of reps for each exercise, most likely five reps.

But in this case, she could do nearly twice that number of reps on almost every other exercise. Sure, the old method would still be moderately effective for fat loss, but with these adjustments we have optimized it.

Instead of being limited by her weakest exercise, we have set things up in a way that challenges Lauren supremely on every part of the complex.

Rather than focus on arbitrary prescriptions for reps, we allow for a little leeway and have to think a bit more during the complex. It's harder, more involved and infinitely more effective.

Finally, once again, please note the order of the exercises: we start with a highly technical exercise (Full Snatch) and then proceed to work non-competing body parts. This allows Lauren to recover faster and continue to work harder. Overall, the entire complex becomes more efficient.


Closing Thoughts

Sure, you can probably drop a good deal of fat with "regular" complexes; after all, they do force you to do a lot of work in little time.

However, if you want to take your fat loss to the next level or challenge yourself in a whole new way, why settle for just expediency?

Instead of just tossing a barbell around, put in a few minutes of planning, follow the rules and methods described above and make your complexes both expedient andeffective.



Complexes 2.0 — Optimize Your Fat-Loss WorkoutsComplexes 2.0 — Optimize Your Fat-Loss Workouts

The Ab Lounge: Probably more useful for sex than for getting a six-pack.


You can (hopefully) deadlift more than you overhead press. Why use the same reps for each?

Complexes 2.0 — Optimize Your Fat-Loss Workouts

Stop using pansy weights and start loading up the bar.

Complexes 2.0 — Optimize Your Fat-Loss Workouts

Technical lifts come first. That way you don't catch the bar awkwardly and potentially hurt yourself.

About John Romaniello

Complexes 2.0 — Optimize Your Fat-Loss Workouts

John Romaniello is the owner of Roman Fitness Systems, LLC, a personal training and online coaching service based in New York. In addition to training, Roman maintains a website where he blogs about fitness, nerdy stuff, sex, pop-culture and himself. He can be reached at Roman@RomanFitnessSytems.com.


© 1998 — 2009 Testosterone, LLC. All Rights Reserved.


Wikio

High Reps or Heavy Weight? by Charles Poliquin


The best studies on hypertrophy have been done in Finland, and they found that wrestlers, bodybuilders, powerlifters, and weightlifters all hypertrophy... but for different reasons. The most important thing for hypertrophy training is to actually do varied training. Look at Ronnie Coleman. He used to train as a powerlifter then he trained as a bodybuilder: varied training.

Look at pre-1980s bodybuilders, back when steroid usage was fairly light compared to today. Back then, they trained as part of a subculture with weightlifters and powerlifters. By society's standards, people who lifted weights were weirdoes. So all these people lifted in the same gyms and shared training methodologies.

The forgotten element of hypertrophy training today is the principle of overload. People don't try to lift heavier, they just double their drug dosage.

So, "going for the burn" and getting a pump with higher reps is one way to hypertrophy, but not the only way. For example, if I make you do eccentric squats and eccentric chins, you're going to put some weight on, but you don't have a burn.

Hypertrophy is a function of load vs. time under tension. Since it's a product, you can work at one end or the other, or both. Let's say you can squat 135 pounds for 10. Well, if you go on to squat 135 for 30, your legs will grow. But if, instead, you go on to squat 225 for 10, your legs will grow too, only for a different reason. And if you can eventually do 225 for 50, then your legs will really get big!

Both systems work.

Wikio

Zottman Curl


High-Rep Deadlift

Here's a quick history lesson: George Zottman was a 19th century strongman who built 19-inch arms and 15-inch forearms using, among other exercises, a unique palms-up/palms-down combination dumbbell curl. Zottman weighed 215 pounds at just under 6-feet tall, and would regularly use a pair of 50-pounders for slow, controlled reps.

Here's how to follow in his footsteps (or shirtsleeves, as the case may be.) Grab a pair of dumbbells and perform a "regular", supinated curl (with palms up). When you reach the midpoint of the movement and the dumbbells are at shoulder level, rotate your palms down (pronate) and thenlower the weights. At the bottom, rotate to palms up before starting to curl the next rep.

This is one of the best all-around arm exercises, since it targets all of the elbow flexors in the biceps and forearms together. It does require a bit of flexibility and coordination, so take a few sessions to get comfortable with the movement. Using 4x5-7, as your primary biceps exercise, will be plenty to build old school arm size.


Wikio

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

The Body Shop Vol 2


Physique Evaluations from Dr. Clay Hyght, NPC Judge


In this TMUSCLE series aimed at the aesthetically-minded lifter, members have the opportunity to get their physiques professionally evaluated by Dr. Clay Hyght, an NPC judge, medical professional, and competitive bodybuilder.

Whether you're thinking of stepping onto the bodybuilding or Figure stage or you just want to maximize your beach-body potential, Dr. Clay will tell you where your weaknesses are and how to fix them.

Let's jump right into this month's evaluations!


Tim

Info:

Dr. Clay: You already have a good physique, but you could have a great physique. So let me give you a few pointers that'll help to bridge that gap.

Your clavicles (shoulders) are just a smidge on the narrow side. Therefore, it's imperative that you build yourself a set of cannonball deltoids and prevent your upper traps from getting too big.

Right now your upper traps are perfect. So don't let them get any bigger or they'll make your shoulders appear even narrower. But you don't want them to shrink either. The ancillary stimulation that they'll receive from exercises like deadlifts will probably be all you need to maintain them, because upper traps are surprisingly resistant to atrophy.

Your delts themselves are quite symmetrical from front to back and also have some decent development, but they need to come up quite a bit to give your front torso the "wow factor" that it needs. As a general rule I'd start your shoulder workout with an overhead pressing movement before moving on to one targeted exercise each for the anterior and medial deltoids.

Then about once every four workouts, drop the anterior deltoid movement and substitute another medial delt movement. This will keep your shoulders growing, but in a balanced and symmetrical manner. For the record, you should be fine simply hitting one focused rear delt exercise on your back training day.

Your chest is similar in nature in that it's certainly good, but not where it needs to be. Although not ideal, most people's chest appears a bit bottom heavy when standing relaxed, as does yours. Based on that picture alone I might say that you just need to bring up your upper chest a tad. But after looking at your most muscular pose I can see that you need to bring up your upper chest a lot.

One way to realistically evaluate your chest is to flex it and see if it appears pretty evenly balanced from top to bottom. Currently, yours doesn't.

But I'd venture to say that within six months of targeted upper and middle chest training you can dramatically improve this. And within one year you could be the owner of a chest that's even thicker on the bottom yet evenly developed all the way to your clavicles.

I'd make low-to-high cable flyes a staple finishing movement in your chest routine. Over time this will really help you out.

Scanning down your physique, I don't think I need to spend any time talking about your abs or quads — they're both great. That doesn't mean you shouldn't still work toward improving them, as they could both use a tad more growth. They should just be at the bottom of your priority list, because if the rest of your physique was proportional to your abs and quads, you'd already be the owner of the bad-ass physique you're capable of having.

Wait, I just remembered that you've only been training legs for a year or so! You lucky bastard! Evidently the combination of your previous gymnastics career, your genetics, and your current quad routine are working. Keep it up, my man!

Though I can only see your calves from the front, they look comparable to your shoulders: good, but not great. Since you already have pretty good calf development, I don't think it'll take anything extraordinary to bring them up to where they need to be. Simply giving them the same focus you do other body parts will probably do the trick.

Since I've already killed your buzz by talking about your calves, we may as well go ahead and discuss your hamstrings. Although I don't have a side shot of your hamstrings, it doesn't look like you won the hamstring lottery like you did the quad lottery.

One simple way to begin remedying this is to separate the two. Trade a quad exercise or two for a hamstring exercise. Therefore more stress isn't being added to your body; instead it's being purposefully redistributed.

If you're training with a body part split, which is what I'd probably recommend, consider starting your hamstring routine with a knee flexion (leg curl) exercise, followed by a hip extension exercise (i.e. stiff-legged deadlifts), then conclude with another leg curl variation.

If you do that and stretch your hamstrings vigorously after training them (when they're still pumped), then you'll be sporting some hams that match your quads sooner rather than later.

Now let's wrap up this discussion with back and arms, both of which are certainly not a glaring weakness on your physique.

I only have one relaxed back picture, but it appears that your back is pretty balanced in terms of width and thickness. In terms of size, I'd say your back is better than your shoulders but not as good as your quads. I doubt your back training needs a huge overhaul, just a bit more focused attention.

Your arms are currently just about the right proportions for your shoulders. But as we discussed, your shoulders do need to come up a bit.

I realize it's easier said than done, but as your shoulders improve, make sure your arms improve proportionally. Speaking of proportion, from what I can tell your biceps and triceps are in proportion to one another, so try to keep it that way.

Once you bring up your chest and shoulders you'll be one big, impressive looking dude! Since I spend a lot of time working with competitive physique athletes, I tend to explain physique potential based on how one could do at certain levels of competition.

If I were to approach your physique potential in the same way, I have little doubt you could win the Masters over-40 division of a local bodybuilding show by this time next year. I could also foresee you being very competitive in the same division at the national level with another year of focused training under your belt.


Liz

Dr. Clay: Liz, as I opened the email that contained your pictures, the first photo I saw was your front relaxed pose. My immediate thought was, "That girl has unlimited potential and can go as far in Figure competitions as she likes!"

Although you possess the right foundation and already have some great muscular development, there are still some improvements you need to make before Gina Aliotti and Nicole Wilkins Lee will start to get nervous.

Starting with your front relaxed pose, the main improvement you need to make is to fill in your upper chest under your clavicles. You want to have enough upper chest development such that there's no significant dip under your collarbones. And at that point your collarbones will practically not even be noticeable.

You also need some middle chest development as well. I'm going to venture to guess that you're not doing much chest work at all, and that will need to change. Make sure to check out my article called Building a Bodybuilder Chest, then focus on the parts about bringing up the middle and upper chest.

To begin to fix this problem sooner rather than later, I'd train chest twice per week while training most other body parts just once weekly.

To nutritionally support the building of this new pectoral mass, make at least one of your chest days higher in carbs/calories, as per my article called How Bodybuilders Should Eat. I'd also surround your workout with copious amounts of fast-acting protein and carbs. SURGE® Recovery, branch chained amino acids, and creatine would be perfect to use pre-, during, and/or after training. Review The 3rd Law of Muscle as well.

In addition to bringing up your chest, your anterior deltoids also need to come up quite a bit. The good news is that this is typically pretty easy to do. A variety of overhead pressing movements and front raises should remedy this.

Unlike your anterior delts, your medial deltoids are already pretty dang good. In fact, I can't believe you have such a capped look to your shoulders considering you've only been training seriously for about a year. I certainly wouldn't stop training and improving your medial delts, but far less focus should be placed on them.

Now let's move inferiorly and talk about your arms.

Overall, your arms need to be brought up in size quite a bit. I almost hesitate to say that, because when you flex your biceps they're incredible! Your triceps certainly aren't shabby either. However, you have rather short muscle bellies in both your biceps and triceps, which makes them appear less impressive when they're not flexed.

To do well in Figure competitions your arms have to look great when in the side relaxed poses... and that's precisely where your arms reveal their thinness. But this should be fairly easy to remedy with plenty of direct arm work.

EZ-bar curls and standing alternating dumbbell curls are two of my favorite biceps exercises, while skull crushers and V-bar pushdowns are two of my favorite triceps exercises.

You'll also need to make sure to do plenty of overhead work on your triceps to target the long head. This will help to minimize the appearance of you having short muscle bellies in your triceps, particularly on the medial aspect.

Before moving away from arms, I notice in your front double biceps pose that your right arm (especially your biceps) seems significantly more developed than your left. This could simply be due to the fact that you're not flexing the left properly, or it could just be due to the fact that you're right-handed. (I'm assuming you're right-handed because you chose to flex your right biceps and right triceps for pictures.)

I suspect that simply paying equal attention to both arms will remedy this asymmetry before too long. If not, then you should start to look at potential nerve impingement at the C-5 nerve root, or the musculocutaneous nerve itself, which innervates the biceps. But assuming you have no history of serious accidents or injuries, I doubt this would be the case.

Now let's talk about your abs. They are awesome. Let's move on.

Your quads are just about right where they need to be. Once you finish leaning out, I suspect you'd have a good balance between your upper and lower body. But you could, however, work on slightly improving the sweep of your quads. This would make your waist appear even narrower and give you more of that coveted X-frame.

Assuming you do decide to compete, it's important that you don't try to diet down so far that your legs are as lean as they need to be on contest day. Doing so would most likely thin out your upper body too much.

Of course this should all be decided as your contest gets nearer, but I suspect you'd do best by getting your legs to where they are almost lean enough, then let the peaking process take care of the rest. This should put your legs right where they need to be on contest day, without having your upper body appear too ripped or striated.

Although your quads are practically on point, your calves need to come up quite a bit to be proportional to your upper thigh development. Hitting them two to three times a week with a variety of set/rep schemes should do the trick. Doing jump rope intervals would also help by improving the motor unit recruitment of your calves. This would make building your calves even easier.

Now let's talk hamstrings. Yours are good, but not great. Keep in mind that in Figure competitions it's extremely important to have really well developed shoulders, back, glutes, and hamstrings. Everything else is largely secondary.

With that in mind, you should work on getting your hamstrings as developed as possible. Having a good sweep or pop to your hamstrings in the side view is really imperative on the Figure stage. There's a posing trick that you can do to make your hamstrings appear more developed than they are, but let's come back to that once you've laid down a little more muscle tissue in your posterior thighs.

Before we talk about how to bring up your hamstrings, let's look at your glutes.

If there's one body part in Figure that's more important than all the rest, that body part is arguably the glutes — primarily the gluteus maximus. Of course it's not just the development of the gluteus maximus that's important, but also the lack of body fat on top of it. But I don't think body fat will ever be a problem for you.

Overall, your glutes (both the size and shape) are really good. But you could improve them by simply developing them more so that your glutes appear more full and rounded from the side. Deep squats, walking lunges, and some direct glute work should do the trick.

Two things come to mind that you can do that would improve both your glutes and hamstrings:

1) Make sure to do your stiff-legged deadlifts in a manner such that you're squeezing your glutes as you approach the top position of the movement.

2) Do a track workout at least once per week. A combination of sprints, plyometrics, and/or stair running will do absolute wonders for your entire lower body, especiallyyour glutes hams and calves, all three of which you need to improve.

Let's wrap up your assessment by examining your back.

Although your back is a bit on the thin side in terms of development, it still looks fantastic because your frame has such a great shape. Plus your back is, thus far, pretty evenly developed between your upper back and your lats.

Essentially, you just need more of the same. For that reason, making deadlifts and/or rack deadlifts a staple in your back routine would be a good choice, as would different pull-up variations.

In my experience, back is the main body part that responds well to a higher frequency of training. So, until further notice I'd structure your program such that you hit back twice per week with a variety of exercises and set rep schemes.

Liz, I've been involved in helping Figure competitors since the very first year they introduced the Figure class. In fact, the very first Figure competitor I helped turned pro. So I know very well what type of physique it takes to be an elite Figure competitor, and you, my friend, have just that type of physique!


Josh

Dr. Clay: As I start to assess your physique, I find myself donning my chiropractor hat. I'm a bit concerned about the sharp angulation (hyperextension) of your spine in your upper, lower back — right about the level of the thoracolumbar (T12/L1) junction. If my observation is correct, then that spinal joint is also likely to be hypermobile, which could cause problems down the road.

I suspect the root of this postural problem is your anteriorly rotated pelvis. If left uncompensated for, an anteriorly rotated pelvis would make you lean forward quite a bit. We compensate by hyperextending our lumbar spine, or leaning back with our upper bodies such that we appear to be perfectly upright. But as you can imagine, this places an undue amount of stress on the lumbar spine, especially the facet joints.

In order to properly evaluate your posture, I leveled the photos. Doing so reveals that you do have a fairly significant forward lean when viewed from the side. This is likely your body's way of keeping itself from the pain and/or injury that would likely result from further hyperextension, most of which would occur where your body has already chosen a pivot point — T12/L1.

I'd start by reading my article called Pain-Free Lower Body Posture. That article will serve as a perfect baseline to help you understand what's going on and how to start to correct it. With you having a PhD in health and exercise science, I have no doubt you'll soak up the information and probably even become quite the expert in lower crossed syndrome — a term that Vladimir Janda coined to describe an anteriorly rotated pelvis and the hypotonic/hypertonic muscular issues that accompany.

Although you're definitely going to need to do the standard "loosen your hips and lower back while toning and strengthening your abs and glutes" type rehab protocol for lower crossed syndrome, I suspect you'll need to place extra attention on anterior core stability.

Now, let's get to the fun stuff!

As I'm looking at your front relaxed pose, it's obvious that you have a great shape to your upper torso: good, but not overpowering upper traps, wide clavicles, good medial delt development, and lats that pop out even though you're not trying to display them. You can't buy or even develop great skeletal structure, so feel blessed that you have one!

You do need some serious work on your upper pecs, however. Although your chest looks good in your side chest pose, your upper chest is lacking significantly in both your front and side relaxed poses. The "muscular cleavage" that you have in your lower chest should go all the way up to the top of your sternum.

So focus on your upper and middle chest, but don't completely neglect your lower chest as it could use a bit more size as well.

Moving down a bit, you need to work on your abdominal development as well. I'm quite certain that some of the lack of pop to your abs is due to your lower crossed syndrome and the subsequent lack of abdominal tone plus slight abdominal distention that comes with an anteriorly rotated pelvis. But even in your front double biceps shot your abs should be a bit more apparent, and they will be once you thicken them up a bit.

To accomplish this, err on the side of training abs heavier as opposed to lighter. Many people tend to forget that developing hypertrophy in the abdominals is fundamentally no different than doing so in any other skeletal muscle. You have to tax the muscle with a stimulus (i.e. tension) that forces the muscle to adapt.

With that being said, I do feel that abs tend to recuperate more quickly than other muscles. So, as a general rule of thumb, I'd recommend training your abs three nonconsecutive days per week, like Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Use different exercises to vary the stimulus and to help prevent overtraining, but I wouldn't let the reps get over 12. If you can do more than 12, then you need to add resistance.

As for your quads, they're good to go. I'd just keep doing what you're doing.

Your calves, on the other hand, do need to be brought up quite a bit. Currently your thighs are proportionally wider than your calves. So I'd especially target the medial gastrocnemius as this will fill out your calves when viewed from the front and help them to look proportional when viewed in your front relaxed pose.

By the way, although it's a bit premature to be giving you posing tips, putting your feet closer together will help to minimize the discrepancy between your thighs and calves.

From the side we can see that you need to bring up your arms and especially your hamstrings. You're standing with your knees almost fully extended, which makes almost anyone's hamstrings appear fairly flat. But, as you can see in your side chest pose, you could still use significantly more development in the posterior thigh region. In bodybuilding, basically your hamstrings and back can't be too developed.

I don't think it'll take anything top-secret or cutting edge to fill in your hams, just a lot of hard, focused hamstring work.

Back to your arms. Although your arms need more size overall, your biceps are pretty dang impressive, especially that freaky peak on your right biceps.

Your triceps, however, are a different story — they need some work! I'd definitely train them twice per week for a while, and make sure to focus on exercises that target the long head of the triceps (i.e. overhead extension movements).

Let me back up just a bit. I realize you're following DC (Dante Trudell, a.k.a. Doggcrapp) training principles, and I'm a fan of Dante's work myself. With that being said, I feel that it's often beneficial to deviate from DC training in order to bring up lagging body parts. Your triceps are an example.

If blasting them with one killer rest-pause set every 5 days or so was going to build you some great triceps, then I think you'd already have a really good pair. It's kind of like the old saying, "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing while expecting a different result."

If you were to follow up eight weeks of DC blasting with eight weeks of a more traditional, higher volume, bodybuilding-type program designed specifically for your physique, you'd be amazed at the results! I've heard it said right here on TMUSCLEyears ago: "The best training program in the world is the one you're currently not on."

Overall, your back is really good. You have a good blend of thickness and width with no glaring weaknesses. Just focus on getting a little bit more of the same — balanced, symmetrical muscle.

If I were your bodybuilding coach, here's what I would say: "Let's plan for you to compete next fall some time. That will give us time to put some muscle on you and bring up your weak points before starting to diet down.

"Weight-wise, our initial goal will be to get you up from 165 to about 175, but with practically the exact same amount of body fat. Then we'll maintain that weight while gradually leaning you out just a tad. Then, at roughly 16 weeks out we'll start whittling away every speck of visible fat you have while being equally focused on keeping every ounce of muscle."

Josh, I have no doubt you can do a bodybuilding show... and kick some serious ass doing it! In fact, my goal for you would be nothing short of first place in the Novice division!

— Dr. Clay


Want Dr. Clay's Professional Advice?

Want to be featured in a future installment of The Body Shop? Then drop me an email at CS@TMUSCLE.com. Include at least four clear photos — front, back, left side, and right side — all unflexed. You may also include a flexed shot or two, but the four unflexed shots are mandatory.

No blurry cell phone pics you took using the bathroom mirror, okay? Bust out a real camera and get someone to take some decent shots of you. And don't forget to get your legs into the pics, too!

Along with your photos, please include a brief bio: age, years spent seriously training, height, weight, goals, and stuff like that. Thanks! — Chris Shugart



Tim


The Body Shop Vol 2The Body Shop Vol 2The Body Shop Vol 2

Liz


The Body Shop Vol 2The Body Shop Vol 2The Body Shop Vol 2

Josh


The Body Shop Vol 2The Body Shop Vol 2The Body Shop Vol 2

About Dr. Clay


The Body Shop Vol 2

Clay Hyght, DC, CSCS, CISSN has been a competitive bodybuilder for 17 years, and an NPC Judge for many of those. Residing in Danville, CA, Dr. Clay works with some of the top competitors in bodybuilding and Figure. Dr. Clay's new book, Set Your Metabolism on Fire, is more than 100 pages long, and packed with fat-burning, muscle-building information, including complete meal plans. Whether it's because he's a really nice guy or an idiot, he's giving it away for free! VisitDrClay.com to get your copy before he comes to his senses.


© 1998 — 2009 Testosterone, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Wikio

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Seven Things You Need to Know About Carbs



We all know it:

The right dietary fats are good.

Protein is very good.

Carbs are... well, tricky little bastards.

As a guy who wants to build muscle and avoid excess fat gain, I've been all over the board when it comes to carbohydrates. At one extreme, I've obsessed over the single carb you might find in an egg. On the other extreme, I'm stuffed myself with pancakes and syrup multiple times a day.

Carbs are the fiery redhead of the macronutrient world: so many possibilities, so many dangers.

So what's new in carbohydrate research? What's on the minds of today's top nutrition scientists? There's only one heavy-squattin', big-benchin' food expert to call: Dr. Lonnie Lowery.


1. Carbs, Freezing, and Toasting: A Funny Thing Happens...

Jacking up your insulin level at the wrong time is bad news for your physique. Yet jacking it up at the right time — around the time of your butt-whuppin' bodybuilding workout — can do damn near magical things when it comes to packing on muscle. This phenomenon has even been given a name: The 3rd Law of Muscle.

You know the deal: The glycemic index, or GI, is a measure of the effects of carbohydrates on blood sugar levels. Carbs that break down quickly during digestion, releasing glucose rapidly into the bloodstream, have a high GI. Carbs that break down more slowly release glucose more gradually into the bloodstream, so they have a low GI.

White bread eaten alone has always been a standard food reference for GI. But leave it to Dr. Lowery to find an interesting twist here.

"If you freeze or you toast a piece of white bread, it'll change its glycemic index," says Lowery. "Most people don't realize that."

In 2008, researchers fed test subjects white bread and did the standard glucose curve test. On other days, they had subjects eat white bread that had been frozen then thawed. Next, they toasted the bread, and finally they tried a combination of freezing and toasting. The result?

If you freeze white bread (then thaw it of course) and eat it, it has a 31% lower glycemic index. In other words, the carbs are slower acting. Basically, freezing starches seems to change things.

"But it gets better," adds Lowery. "If you toast white bread it has a 25% lower GI compared to plain white bread."

Okay, so what happens when you freeze then toast white bread? You get bread with a 39% lower glycemic index.

Very interesting, yes? But most of us probably aren't pounding back white bread anyway. So does this work with whole grain breads and, my personal favorite, Ezekiel bread? Well, the study was only performed on white bread, and Dr. Lowery would like to see this tested on other starches, but it might also be true for healthier bread products.

So, if you enjoy occasional white bread as a treat, toss the loaf in the freezer when you get it home. Or, if you're stuck at grandma's house during the holidays and being forced to eat a leftover turkey sandwich on Wonder bread, you can freeze and then toast it to reduce the GI and possibly reduce any abs-wrecking effects.


2. Once And For All: Beans Are Good Carbs!

Beans are so low when it comes to glycemic index that Dr. Lowery suggests that people eat them even when on low-carb diets. In fact, it may be time that we just come out and say it: Beans are like green vegetables: eat pretty much all you want... keeping gas issues in mind, please!

"If the glycemic index is at roughly 100 scale, then things in their teens and twenties enter your bloodstream so slowly that your glucose rises very gradually — so slowly that they're almost a non-issue," says Lowery. Indeed, the officially accepted definition of "low GI" is a GI range of 55 or less.

Dr. Lowery noted that when he competed in bodybuilding and was "jonesing for carbs," that beans became his out: a food he could get full on without wrecking his strict contest prep.

Now, you do have to be careful with beans' associated fart-producing effects, plus they're so high in fiber that you may want to "ease into" eating lots of beans. Still, there's simply no reason to fear beans, even if you're a low-carber.

By the way, Dr. Lowery also uses white bean flour in recipes to crank up the fiber and crank down the GI. You can replace around 25% of the regular flour called for in most recipes with bean flour without it tasting too "beany."


3. Tales from the Lab: Monster Carb Loading vs. Monster Muscles

Dr. Lowery likes to do his own version of Tales from the Crypt. Only instead of a crypt it's a lab, and instead of buckets of gore it's buckets of carbs. In this case, pie filling.

"I was part of a carb-loading study back in grad school," says Dr. Lowery. "Man, it was fun. We're talking about eating pie filling all day! We took in 9 grams of carbs per kilogram of body weight. It was crazy.

"After we carbed up, instead of doing the usual exercise science stuff, like performance testing on a treadmill, we did visual assessments with a camera and we used tape measures to look at muscle girth. Surprisingly, even with monster carb loading, we couldn't measure an increase in muscle girth."

In other words, there's no question they doubled or tripled their muscle glycogen stores during this three-day carb load, and Dr. Lowery did notice some increased "fullness," but there was no physical girth change as you might expect. Sure, these guys probably had great pumps in the gym, but all those carbs didn't make them walk around measurably larger and looking "jacked."

"You may feel like you're bigger at rest when you're carbed up, and the hypothesis for this study was that we'd be able to measure an increase in muscle girth," says Dr. Lowery. "But the reality is that there's no grossly measurable difference in muscle girth at rest, no matter how many carbs you pack into it."

Just a little reality check from the lab.


4. Carbs and During-Exercise Stress

"I've done a lot of digging on things that will reduce stress during training," Lowery says. "And the answer is: simple carbohydrate intake during exercise. This is one of the few things that has hard science supporting it. Simple carbs during training consistently and reliably reduce stress markers like interleukin 6 during exercise."

Now, interleukin 6 is a catabolic (muscle-wasting), inflammatory cytokine, something you certainly would want to reduce. For one thing, reducing it can help put the kibosh on overtraining symptoms for those of us who hit it hard six days a week.

In short, more evidence that pre- and during-lifting carbs are vitally important for people seeking maximum muscle.


5. Excess Carb Calories = Fatness

"There's a lot of very solid biochemistry behind why excess carbohydrate calories are fattening," says Lowery. "I debate with certain dieticians who say that excess protein calories 'turn to fat,' but with carbs it's not even up for debate. The evidence is just that clear."

To prove this, Dr. Lowery will often wheel in a metabolic cart when he's teaching class. Students will come in fasted, get hooked up to the cart, and be able to see how they're burning 60 to 90% of all their calories from body fat. He'll then give them a sugary drink (no doubt with an accompanying maniacal laugh, perhaps punctuated with lightening crashes).

Within 20 minutes the students will have halted fat breakdown and started using carbs both for fuel and for lipogenesis or body fat creation. "It completely stops the fat-burning process and begins the fat creation process!" Lowery says.

Given this hard evidence, it's really no wonder that sugary colas get slammed as one of the big causes of the obesity epidemic. But Lowery notes that this can happen withall excess carbs, not just with the full-sugar Mountain Dew he uses to demonstrate this to his students.

Take home lesson: If you want to jack up insulin for bodybuilding purposes, if you're wanting to fill up your muscles with glycogen, then you simply can't do that all day long on a daily basis. Instead, slam the button down during the peri-workout window.

"A lot of that bad biochemistry that happens during rest doesn't happen during exercise. Your hormonal state changes. You're contracting large muscle groups. You're doing something with that blood sugar during training," says Lowery.

So, time carb intake right with exercise and you can get a lot of those muscle-building and glycogen-storing benefits of insulin. Then, back off the carbs.

If there's a Holy Grail of bodybuilding nutrition, it involves the tactically timed intake of the right kind of carbs. No doubt about it.


6. The Anti-Grain/Allergen Trend: "Overstated!"

Okay, so those of us who prefer to have visible abs know that bread and pasta are our boogeymen, But recently there's been a movement against all grains, even things like old-fashioned oatmeal and brown rice. The basic idea is that not only are these things allergenic to many people, they're also foods that human being just aren't made/evolved to eat.

So, are all grain-based carbs bad or are some people throwing the proverbial baby out with the bathwater?

"That's overstated sometimes," Lowery opines. "I think many of the anti-grain gurus in the industry get a little too excited about this whole allergen thing. It goes a little bit too far. Most prevalence data on food allergens suggests single-digit percentages in human populations."

But Dr. Lowery agrees that a grain-based diet is part of America's obesity problem. "What people have to understand is that grain-based diets are pushed on us because it's the only sustainable way to feed millions and millions of human beings. You can't do that with lean meats, fruits, and vegetables. But luckily we can seek out those things, especially in a country like America."

Dr. Lowery goes on to say that a lot of nutrition education and the nutritional choices that we're fed in this country aren't based on metabolism, but on subsidies.

"It's disturbing to think that the kinds of subsidies that corn growers get are vastly bigger than any subsidies that fruit and vegetable growers get," says Lowery. "And remember, we consume three times as much corn in the form of corn syrup than as whole corn, which is a grain. If you eat corn, eat if off the cob."

By the way, Dr. Lowery starts off every day with either oatmeal or oat bran made with berries and vanilla protein powder, or he has eggs and a low-glycemic carb like an apple. Always nice to know what these nutrition scientists do in their real lives based on all the info they have stored away in their big brains.


7. The Whole Grain Sham?

"Yes, there are some advantageous phytochemicals in 100% whole grains, plus some extra fiber. But again, this whole grain push is influenced by the lobbyists and the subsidy system to make grains seem really great," says Dr. Lowery.

He also notes that while some research shows that people who eat more whole grains have less body fat, who is this compared to? People chugging down colas and eating white bread?

"Be careful with these label claims," adds Lowery. "Think population specificity. We, bodybuilders and athletes, are a very specific population. Whole grains may indeed help someone who normally starts his day with greasy McDonald's hash browns. But our population, the physique-conscious crowd, is light years ahead of the regular population. What may be a step forward for them would be a step backwardfor us."

Preach on, LL. Preach on.


Final Words

Talking with Dr. Lowery is like reading a William Gibson novel: Every few sentences he drops a Big Idea on you that gets you to thinking. Here are three from our latest phone call:

"Do you want the secret? And I mean THE secret? Here it is: leans meats, fruits, and vegetables."

"There's a stigma against bodybuilders. People assume they're just big dumb muscleheads. But we are so far ahead of athletes in any other sport when it comes to nutritional knowledge that it's not even funny."

"Nutrition isn't that complex in theory, but it is in practice."

And with those words, our food expert said a mouthful.

Next up: Things You Need to Know About Fats. Stay tuned!



7 Things You Need to Know About Carbs

Type II Diabetes: All the cool kids are doing it!

7 Things You Need to Know About Carbs

Beans: They'll make you fart but they won't make you fat.




7 Things You Need to Know About Carbs

Interleukin 6, a.k.a. nasty shit.

7 Things You Need to Know About Carbs

Whole grains: They'll still make ya fat if you're not careful!

About Dr. Lonnie Lowery

7 Things You Need to Know About Carbs

Dr. Lonnie Lowery is an exercise physiologist, nutritionist, and hardcore musclehead. For more info, checkout NutritionRadio.org.


© 1998 — 2009 Testosterone, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Wikio

Probiotics for Weight Loss?


Johns Hopkins University
By Margaret Furtado, M.S., R.D. - Posted on Tue, Nov 24, 2009, 11:54 am PST

Believe it or not, the human body contains more bacteria living inside than individual cells: 100 trillion microorganisms live in our gastrointestinal tract as compared with a "mere" 10 trillion human cells in our body. And one of the best kinds of microorganisms we can have flourishing inside our bodies are theprobiotics, the healthy bacteria that live in our intestines or gut. Now, new research from the Stanford University School of Medicine and Stanford Hospital and Clinics suggests probiotics might even enhance weight-loss programs.

The Stanford researchers first noticed the beneficial effects of probiotics on weight when working with extremely obese patients who've had gastric-bypass surgery. But studies are showing that the benefits of probiotics are not limited to those who've had this medical procedure.

So why are probiotics assisting with weight loss? Several studies have suggested that the guts of normal-weight people contain a different mix or balance of the types and amounts of bacteria that are found in the intestines of overweight folks. One study even found these same imbalances among the microorganisms in 7-year-old kids who were overweight.

Could it be that bad bacteria are causing at least some of our weight issues? Is it possible that one day we'll just ingest a dollop of "weight-friendly" bacteria to bring our body size under control?

It's too soon to know exactly where this discovery will lead, so here are my recommendations:

  • Be sure to include foods in your diet that contain probiotics, such as yogurt.
  • Avoid brands of yogurt that have the "fruit" at the bottom and instead go with low-fat, low-sugar varieties that contain plenty of protein and calcium. A cup of yogurt is a great snack to hold you over in between meals or after a workout. Greek yogurts are especially high in protein.
  • Make prebiotics part of your regular diet as well. Prebiotics--tiny fibers found in some fruits and vegetables--just happen to be what probiotics and other good bacteria eat. Good sources of prebiotics include wheat, bananas, onions, garlic, and leeks. (Europeans eat far more prebiotics than do people in the U.S--might this explain part of the weight discrepancy between the U.S. and European populations?)
  • If you have digestive issues, be sure to talk with your doctor or dietitian about "pharmaceutical-grade" probiotics, which are the equivalent of prescription-strength good bacteria.

Last, a caveat: Don't even think about starting to load up on probiotics so that you can slack off on exercise or ignore your healthy eating plan. There is no miracle probiotic cure in the pipeline!

Wikio