a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
by Jeffry S. Life, M.D. Ph.D. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The United Nations, the World Health Organization, and 37 countries including the United States have proclaimed 2000-2010 as the Bone and Joint Decade to promote the importance of a healthy musculoskeletal structure for a lifetime. The number of people older than 50 will double between 1990 and 2020. Advances in medicine continue to make it possible for more people to live longer, but today most want to live stronger and maintain their quality of life. Each year, musculoskeletal conditions and injuries account for about 102.3 million visits to physician offices, 10.2 million hospital outpatient visits, 25 million emergency department visits, 3 million hospitalizations, and 7.5 million procedures, and they cost an estimated $300 billion.1 As the baby boom generation ages, people in their 50s begin to notice more aches and pains after performing the same activities that were painless in their 40s, and those in their 60s can't do as much as they did in their 50s. Roy Shephard, MD, PhD, professor emeritus of applied physiology at the University of Toronto, points out that, "Both aerobic power and muscle strength decline by as much as 10% for every decade of adult life, but a progressive exercise prescription can enhance function by 10% to 20%; thus, in terms of functional capacity, conditioning can reduce biological age by 10 to 20 years."2 In 1998, the American College of Sports Medicine issued its first position statement on aging and exercise,3 in which it recommended strength training for frail older people. Petrella says, "We now know that older patients can perform to very high levels, so exercise prescription does not differ for older and younger persons, and training effects for the elderly can exceed those of younger people at the upper end of VO2max." Exercise is really a form of medicine that can prevent or treat many disabling or fatal diseases. Seventy percent of deaths (1.5 million) each year in the United States are a result of eight killers: heart disease, cancer, stroke, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, and osteoporosis4. Other diseases treatable with exercise--obesity, arthritis, depression, and dyslipidemia--contribute considerably to disability and premature death The health rewards of exercise extend far beyond its benefits for specific diseases. Exercise reduces blood clotting, enhances self-image, elevates mood, reduces stress, improves appearance, increases energy, gives the feeling of well-being (probably by stimulating endorphins). It reinforces other positive life-style changes, such as healthier eating habits and smoking cessation5. It also stimulates creative thinking 6. Furthermore, the ability of exercise to restore function to organs, muscles, joints, and bones is not shared by drugs or surgery. Paradoxically, conventional medical practice favors physical rest and inactivity during recovery from illness. Aerobic Exercise vs. Resistance Training Recently, an expert panel of scientists, organized by the American Heart Association, has finally put to rest that age-old myth that weight training and other forms of resistance exercise are bad for the heart. In fact, this committee has advised doctors to actually start recommending this form of exercise for their healthy older patients, as well as those with heart disease, including some people with recent heart attacks as long as they are closely monitored and supervised by experienced health professionals. Obviously, this is great news. Now doctors can encourage their patients with healthy hearts (no matter what their age or gender) and those with unhealthy hearts (under medical supervision) to start using resistance training along with their aerobic training as an integral part of their heart-disease prevention and/or treatment program. The following table, by Pollock and Vincent, from The President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports Research Digest, is found in my article entitled “Why Everyone Should Lift Weights” in this website. This table helps us better understand the differences in aerobic (cardio) training and resistance training.
As individuals age they need more strength training. In Regaining the Power of Youth At Any Age, Cooper writes: “Up to age 50, people lose about four percent of their strength and muscle mass per decade. After that, the loss increases to about 10 percent per decade.” “By age 60”, he goes on to say, “the average man will have lost about one third of his muscle mass—unless he makes an effort to reverse the process through weight training.” Women have a similar decline as they age. Cooper still leans toward aerobics because he believes the supporting evidence at this time is stronger. He cites a number of impressive studies showing that endurance training slows the steady erosion of oxygen uptake capacity with age that appears to occur for both trained and untrained individuals. He cites one study, which indicates that it may even be possible to stop the decline with hard consistent training. That study, reported in the Journal of Applied Physiology, followed a group of track athletes, age 50 to 82, who remained highly competitive for 10 years – and found that their aerobic capacity remained unchanged during the entire time. Individuals who aren’t satisfied with a moderate level of fitness can take heart from a study published March 14, 2002, in the New England Journal of Medicine. The researchers concluded that exercise capacity is perhaps the most powerful predictor of mortality. They found a direct relationship between greater fitness and longer survival. Most previous studies have emphasized that the least fit have the most to gain from exercise, that the most striking reduction in mortality results when one becomes active and moves out of the poor fitness category. An earlier study reported in 1989 by the Institute for Aerobic Fitness in Dallas highlighted that those in the high-fitness group were only slightly less likely to die than those in the medium-fitness groups, but this study shows that people benefit in proportion to their level of fitness. As in other studies, the researchers found a "striking difference" in mortality rates between the least fit 25 percent and the next quintile of fitness. "This observation concurs with the consensus," the researchers wrote, "that the greatest health benefits are achieved by increasing physical activity among the least fit." They also demonstrated that there is a nearly linear reduction in risk with increasing quintiles of fitness. With each 1-MET increase in exercise capacity there was a 12 % improvement in survival. Participants whose exercise capacity was less than 5 MET were roughly twice as likely to die as those with exercise capacity of more than 8 Met. Absolute exercise capacity measured in METs predicted risk of death better than percentage of age predictions. In both healthy participants and those with cardiovascular disease, peak exercise capacity was found to be a stronger predictor of death than risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, obesity, heart arrhythmia, high cholesterol, and even smoking. Poor fitness proved to be the deadliest risk factor of all. Lead author Jonathan Myers, a professor of medicine at Stanford University, told the Washington Post "No matter how we twisted it, exercise came out on top." Gary J. Balady, M.D., summarized the message in an editorial which accompanied the report: "The data from the study compel the clinician to go beyond the identification of risk to the initiation of interventions, such as the prescription of increased physical activity and exercise, in order to modify risk, particularly in patients with low levels of fitness." Benefits of Exercise Therapy for the Common Serious Diseases Coronary artery disease7-11. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is our number one killer, responsible for 2,000 deaths in the United States each day. About twice as many heart attacks occur every day. CAD claims many people who are at the peak of their career. Exercise combined with diet therapy can reverse established heart disease. Furthermore, exercise improves heart function, reduces several coronary risk factors (hypertension, high cholesterol, low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and obesity), enhances psychosocial wellbeing after a heart attack, and improves survival. In summary, exercise is an effective strategy for preventing heart disease, and it is a beneficial, low-cost, pleasure-giving treatment without the side effects of drugs or the risks, pain, and expense of surgery. A Plan for Therapy To be maximally effective for therapy or health enhancement, an exercise program must fulfill certain basic requirements: It must be a daily activity (7 days a week), it must be fun, not painful or excessively fatiguing, and it must fit an individual's preferences5-6. The selected activities must be readily available, not distant or difficult to reach, and preferably be close to the home or workplace. The clothes, equipment, and/or club membership associated with the activity must be inexpensive. Ideally, the activity should not depend on other people (team, class, or partners), but should permit group participation if desired. And finally, the activity must be suitable for lifelong participation. Encourage Lifelong Habits The daily goal is to exercise for at least 30 to 60 minutes (2% to 4% of the day) and to make a conscious effort to do body movement throughout 16 hours of the day (i.e., doing household chores, working, shopping, gardening, running errands, visiting, or socializing in an active manner5-6). The first step in a pre-participation evaluation by your physician is to be evaluated for reasons not to be involved in exercise testing and training and to identify any risks or limitations relevant to an exercise program. An efficient screening questionnaire addresses previous exercise programs; present activity (frequency, duration, and intensity); existing chronic or acute disease(s), especially chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease, and extreme motor limitations because of severe arthritis; family history of cardiorespiratory disease; and coronary artery disease risk factors. Though most of the risk of exercise-related morbidity and mortality is associated with preexisting cardiac conditions, contraindications to exercise testing and training are the same for older and younger adults. Absolute contraindications to formal exercise testing include recent electrocardiographic changes or acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, third-degree heart block, and acute congestive heart failure47. Relative contraindications to exercise testing include elevated blood pressure, cardiomyopathies, valvular heart disease, complex ventricular ectopy, and uncontrolled metabolic diseases. Physical Examination and Lab Tests The physical exam and laboratory tests focus on a patient’s functional abilities and/or limitations. A medical assistant, nurse, or other midlevel practitioner under a physician's supervision can usually accomplish most of the steps of the pre-participation exam. The average office-based evaluation takes about 20 minutes, though additional time is required if treadmill testing, bone mineral density scans, or respiratory function tests are needed. The physical examination should include vital signs and cardiorespiratory and musculoskeletal evaluation. Cardiovascular fitness. The American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) recommends cardiac treadmill stress testing before commencing vigorous exercise (exercise intensity greater than 60% of maximal oxygen uptake) for men over age 40, women over age 50, and all patients who have cardiac risk factors with or without symptoms47. Treadmill tests, which can be used to estimate the patient's aerobic capacity, are useful for prescribing exercise intensity. If a treadmill test is unavailable, the Kasch pulse-recovery test can be performed in the office to give physicians a general idea of a patient's functional and aerobic capacities. The test is based on the principle that the better one's level of fitness, the sooner the heart rate returns to baseline after exercise. The patient's pulse and blood pressure are measured at rest and 1 minute after he or she has stepped up and down (with both feet) a 12-in. step 24 times per minute for 3 minutes48. To help patients adhere to this pace, setting a metronome to 96 bpm may be helpful. Respiratory function can be determined simply by measuring the patient's forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 second. The Role Physicians Play in Prescribing Exercise Programs Medical students spend a year learning about pharmacology and they receive instruction on drug prescribing throughout their training. Often, the drugs they study will no longer be recommended by the time they are in practice. On the other hand, medical students are not instructed on how to prescribe exercise (or, for that matter, nutrition)—the best medicine of all. Physicians need more training in how to make best use of this powerful therapy. Physicians can successfully encourage increased activity by giving their patients a written exercise prescription along with printed advice on how to design a safe, enjoyable routine. Prescribing exercise is like prescribing medications, surgery, or other therapy—It is a thoughtful compromise between potential benefits and side effects. After careful consideration of these factors, the physician and the patient reach an agreement on the most effective plan. Important considerations include the goal of exercise (e.g., osteoporosis prevention, weight loss, strength improvement, marathon training) and patient preferences. Expanding on his or her current exercise habits is a good starting point because choosing activities the patient already enjoys improves adherence. Setting goals. The ACSM recently published separate position statements on exercise for healthy adults56 and older adults57. Kligman et al.58 have adapted these recommendations, combined with those from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH)59, into a very helpful chart that outlines basic exercise prescriptions for a range of health and fitness goals.
Like the pre-participation medical evaluation, the exercise prescription should address the five major fitness components: cardiovascular fitness, muscle strength and endurance, flexibility, body composition, and balance and agility. Many older patients have low muscle mass and/or decreased strength, underscoring the importance of strength training. The ACSM recently added formal strength training recommendations to its exercise guidelines for adults56. Within the five categories, an individual and his or her physician should select the desired fitness level. The objective is to allow people to indefinitely maintain their current level of function and, ideally, help them reach the next category. The types and dosages of exercise will change as the patient's physiologic function changes. Selecting activities. An exercise program prescribed by your physician should address the type, frequency, duration, and intensity of physical activity for each fitness component. Though the type of exercise is often determined by available facilities and equipment, your preference should carry considerable weight. For example, if you enjoy golf you should be encouraged to occasionally substitute this activity for a treadmill and resistance training session. Your physician should balance the benefits of each exercise mode with the your health goals and physical limitations. For example, walking, bicycling, and swimming provide excellent cardiovascular benefits, but the weight-bearing nature of walking provides a greater stimulus for bone mineral deposition than cycling or swimming does. On the other hand, swimming is better tolerated by people who have joint limitations. Cross-training is an effective compromise among several appropriate options. You can mix exercise modes within any given week or within a single session. Cross-training programs help prevent boredom, condition more muscle groups, and reduce the risk of overuse injury. Determining frequency, duration, and intensity. Exercise variables can be manipulated to enhance compliance, but the dose-response relationship must be considered. Though exercising more often, longer, or harder affords greater conditioning, the relationship between effort and outcome is rarely linear. The point of diminishing return is often reached even before individuals approach levels that pose a risk of excessive fatigue or injury. Surprisingly little exercise is required to meet the recommendations for disease prevention (CDC-NIH recommendations)59. Physicians and exercise physiologists often make frequency and duration recommendations at minimal and optimal levels, with instructions to perform the minimal exercise during the busiest weeks and meet the optimal criteria on all others. Exercise intensity is always prescribed as a range (e.g., a target-heart-rate range of 120 to 145 beats per minute or muscle fatigue in 8 to 12 repetitions). Using an age-predicted target heart rate has limited value and is often misleading, especially as patients age, because 70% to 85% of age-predicted maximal heart rate is often off by 15 to 20 beats per minute. Physiologic change occurs when the body is exposed to stimuli greater than it can currently handle, a concept called “teasing the physiologic threshold.” The concept is useful even in balance and agility training. Many people underestimate their exercise capacity, considering physical activity to be uncomfortable, hazardous, or medically unwise. However, Fiatarone et al60 demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of a strength training program even for nonagenarians. The quantity and load of an exercise should be adjusted as function improved. An exercise prescription should involve monitoring or teaching patients to assess their own progress. MET levels are useful for setting exercise goals. A list of common physical activities classified by intensity in METs is available61. I have attached this article at the end of my article to help you design your exercise program. The Borg perceived exertion scale, http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/physical/measuring/perceived_exertion.htm, As function improves, increasing the intensity or duration of exercise should raise the challenge. In strength training, a common recommendation is to lift to muscle fatigue (inability to complete another lift while maintaining good form) in 8 to 12 repetitions. For older adults, 12 to 15 repetitions using slightly lighter weights may be more appropriate. Weight is increased when the patient can consistently complete 13 repetitions; then he or she repeats the process. The rate of improvement varies among individuals and may be slower in older adults. We have no control over our genetics and very little control over environmental factors, but the things that we can control—diet and exercise—can profoundly affect our longevity and quality of life. Exercise may be the closest thing we have to the fountain of youth. All we have to do is to “just do it.” |
Plagued by Pollen? How To Survive
8 years ago
No comments:
Post a Comment